计算机网络代写/network代写/贝叶斯: Bayesian Networks-Inference and Learning

Bayesian Networks Inference and Learning
计算机网络代写/network代写/贝叶斯: 主要集中在Bayesian Networks
No late assignments will be accepted
PART A [60pts]: INFERENCE IN BAYESIAN NETWORKS
Every year, credit card companies lose millions of dollars due to frauds resulting from lost or stolen cards. Recently,
the financial industry has turned to AI for solutions to the fraud detection problem. Intuitively, credit card
holders tend to make purchases following a certain pattern. A fraud is likely to happen when this pattern is broken. In
this assignment you will implement a simple fraud detection system in two steps. First, you will implement the variable
elimination algorithm. Second, you will define your fraud detection system as a Bayesian network and compute
the likelihood of a fraud in different situations. Computations in your Bayesian network should be done with your
implementation of the variable elimination algorithm. However, if you are not able to complete your implementation
of variable elimination, you can also do the computations by hand since they are relatively simple.
1. [0 pts] Implement the variable elimination algorithm by coding the following 4 functions in the programming
language of your choice.
(a) restrictedFactor = restrict(factor, variable, value): function that restricts a variable to some value in a
given factor.
(b) productFactor = multiply(factor1, factor2): function that multiplies two factors.
(c) resultFactor = sumout(factor, variable): function that sums out a variable in a given factor.
(d) normalizedFactor = normalize(factor): function that normalizes a factor by dividing each entry by the
sum of all the entries. This is useful when the factor is a distribution (i.e. sum of the probabilities must be
1).
(e) resultFactor = inference(factorList, queryVariables, orderedListOfHiddenVariables, evidenceList):
function that computes P r(queryV ariables|evidenceList) by variable elimination. This function should
restrict the factors in factorList according to the evidence in evidenceList. Next, it should sumout the
hidden variables from the product of the factors in factorList. The products and sums should be interleaved
so that each summation is done over the minimal product of factors necessary. The variables should be
summed out in the order given in orderedListOfHiddenVariables. Finally, the answer can be normalized if
a probability distribution that sums up to 1 is desired.
Tip: factors are essentially multi-dimensional arrays, hence you may want to use this data-structure, but feel
free to use a different data-structure.
Tip: test each function individually using simple examples from the lecture slides. If you wait till the end to test
your entire program it will be much harder to debug.
What to hand in: hand in a printout of your code. Note that there are no marks given for Question 1, but you
must hand in your code in order to get any marks for Question 2. Also, in Question 2, part of the marks will be
given for using your variable elimination algorithm to do the computations.
1
2. Suppose you are working for a financial institution and you are asked to implement a fraud detection system.
You plan to use the following information:
• When the card holder is travelling abroad, fraudulent transactions are more likely since tourists are prime
targets for thieves. More precisely, 1% of transactions are fraudulent when the card holder is travelling,
where as only 0.4% of the transactions are fraudulent when she is not travelling. On average, 5% of all
transactions happen while the card holder is travelling. If a transaction is fraudulent, then the likelihood
of a foreign purchase increases, unless the card holder happens to be travelling. More precisely, when the
card holder is not travelling, 10% of the fraudulent transactions are foreign purchases where as only 1%
of the legitimate transactions are foreign purchases. On the other hand, when the card holder is travelling,
then 90% of the transactions are foreign purchases regardless of the legitimacy of the transactions.
• Purchases made over the internet are more likely to be fraudulent. This is especially true for card holders
who don’t own any computer. Currently, 60% of the population owns a computer and for those card
holders, 1% of their legitimate transactions are done over the internet, however this percentage increases
to 2% for fraudulent transactions. For those who don’t own any computer, a mere 0.1% of their legitimate
transactions is done over the internet, but that number increases to 1.1% for fraudulent transactions. Unfortunately,
the credit card company doesn’t know whether a card holder owns a computer, however it can
usually guess by verifying whether any of the recent transactions involve the purchase of computer related
accessories. In any given week, 10% of those who own a computer purchase with their credit card at least
one computer related item as opposed to just 0.1% of those who don’t own any computer.
(a) [15 pts] Construct a Bayes Network that your fraud detection system can use to indentify fraudulent
transactions.
What to hand in: Show the graph defining the network and the Conditional Probability Tables associated
with each node in the graph. This network should encode the information stated above. Your network
should contain exactly six nodes, corresponding to the following binary random variables:
• OC – card holder owns a computer.
• F raud – current transaction is fraudulent.
• T rav – card holder is currently travelling.
• F P – current transaction is a foreign purchase.
• IP – current purchase is an internet purchase.
• CRP – a computer related purchase was made in the past week.
The arcs defining your Bayes Network should accurately capture the probabilistic dependencies between
these variables.
(b) [20 pts] What is the prior probability (i.e., before we search for previous computer related purchases and
before we verify whether it is a foreign and/or an internet purchase) that the current transaction is a fraud?
What is the probability that the current transaction is a fraud once we have verified that it is a foreign
transaction, but not an internet purchase and that the card holder purchased computer related accessories
in the past week?
What to hand in: Indicate what queries (i.e., P r(variables|evidence)) you used to compute those probabilities.
Whether you answer the queries by hand or using the code you wrote for Question 1, provide a
printout of the factors computed at each step of variable elimination. Use the following variable ordering
when summing out variables in variable elimination: T rav, F P, F raud, IP, OC, CRP. Note that a
maximum of two thirds of the marks are earned if you answer correctly the question by doing the computations
by hand instead of using your program. No marks are awarded for answering the questions using
some other software.
(c) [20 pts] After computing those probabilities, the fraud detection system raises a flag and recommends that
the card holder be called to confirm the transaction. An agent calls at the domicile of the card holder but
she is not home. Her spouse confirms that she is currently out of town on a business trip. How does the
probability of a fraud change based on this new piece of information?
2
What to hand in: Same as for Question 2b.
(d) [5 pts] Suppose you are not a very honest employee and you just stole a credit card. You know that the
fraud detection system uses the Bayes net designed earlier but you still want to make an important purchase
over the internet. What can you do prior to your internet purchase to reduce the risk that the transaction
will be rejected as a possible fraud?
What to hand in: Tell me the action taken and indicate by how much the probability of a fraud gets
reduced. Follow the same instructions as for Question 2b.
PART B [40pts]: NA¨IVE BAYES LEARNING
In assignment 2, you learned a decision tree to classify text documents in two sets given a labeled training set.
Here you will learn a Na¨ıve Bayes classifier for the same data. The data is made from documents that were posted
on the alt.atheism and comp.graphics newsgroup (at some time in the past). The file datasets.zip
contains the training and test data: each line of the files trainData.txt and testData.txt is formatted
”docId wordId” which indicates that word wordId is present in document docId. The files trainLabel.txt
and testLabel.txt indicate the label/category (1=alt.atheism or 2=comp.graphics) for each document
(docId = line#). The file words.txt indicates which word corresponds to each wordId (denoted by
the line#). If you are using Matlab, the file loadScript.m provides a simple script to load the files into
appropriate matrices. At the Matlab prompt, just type ”loadScript” to execute the script. Feel free to use any
other language and to build your own loading script for the data if you prefer.
Implement code to learn a na¨ıve Bayes model by maximum likelihood1
. More precisely, learn a Bayesian
network where the root node is the label/category variable with one child variable per word feature. The word
variables should be binary and represent whether that word is present or absent in the document. Learn the
parameters of the model by maximizing the likelihood of the training set only. This will set the class probability
to the fraction of documents in the training set from each category, and the probability of a word given a
document category as the fraction of documents in that category that contain that word. You should use a
Laplace correction by adding 1 to numerator and 2 to the denominator, in order to avoid situations where both
classes have probability of 0. Classify documents by computing the label/category with the highest posterior
probability Pr(label|words in document). Report the training and testing accuracy (i.e., percentage of correctly
classified articles).
What to hand in:
• [10 pts] A printout of your code.
• [10 pts] A printout listing the 10 most discriminative word features measured by
max
word
| log Pr(word|label1) − log Pr(word|label2)|
Since the posterior of each label is multiplied by the conditional probability Pr(word|labeli), a word
feature should be more discriminative when the ratio Pr(word|label1)/Pr(word|label2) is large or small
and therefore when the absolute difference between log Pr(word|label1) and log Pr(word|label2) is large.
In your opinion, are these good word features?
• [10 pts] Training and testing accuracy (i.e., two numbers indicating the percentage of correctly classified
articles for the training and testing set).
• [5 pts] The na¨ıve Bayes model assumes that all word features are independent. Is this a reasonable assumption?
Explain briefly.
• [5 pts] What could you do to extend the Na¨ıve Bayes model to take into account dependencies between
words?
1For the precise equations for this, see the note on the course webpage https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/˜jhoey/teaching/cs486/
naivebayesml.pdf
3

发表评论

邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注